Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Neetha John <[email protected]>
neethajohn
added
Unit Tests
Request for 202012 Branch
Request for 202111 Branch
yxieca
approved these changes
Jul 5, 2022
prsunny
approved these changes
Jul 6, 2022
yxieca
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2022
Why I did it Storage backend has all vlan members tagged. If untagged packets are received on those links, they are accounted as RX_DROPS which can lead to false alarms in monitoring tools. Using this acl to hide these drops. How I did it Created a acl template which will be loaded during minigraph load for backend. This template will allow tagged vlan packets and dropped untagged How to verify it Unit tests Signed-off-by: Neetha John <[email protected]>
qiluo-msft
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2022
Why I did it Storage backend has all vlan members tagged. If untagged packets are received on those links, they are accounted as RX_DROPS which can lead to false alarms in monitoring tools. Using this acl to hide these drops. How I did it Created a acl template which will be loaded during minigraph load for backend. This template will allow tagged vlan packets and dropped untagged How to verify it Unit tests Signed-off-by: Neetha John <[email protected]>
skbarista
pushed a commit
to skbarista/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2022
Why I did it Storage backend has all vlan members tagged. If untagged packets are received on those links, they are accounted as RX_DROPS which can lead to false alarms in monitoring tools. Using this acl to hide these drops. How I did it Created a acl template which will be loaded during minigraph load for backend. This template will allow tagged vlan packets and dropped untagged How to verify it Unit tests Signed-off-by: Neetha John <[email protected]>
liushilongbuaa
pushed a commit
to liushilongbuaa/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
Related work items: sonic-net#284, sonic-net#288, sonic-net#624, sonic-net#630, sonic-net#640, sonic-net#2164, sonic-net#2206, sonic-net#2207, sonic-net#2233, sonic-net#2234, sonic-net#2238, sonic-net#8857, sonic-net#10034, sonic-net#10519, sonic-net#10685, sonic-net#10711, sonic-net#10987, sonic-net#10990, sonic-net#11047, sonic-net#11070, sonic-net#11117, sonic-net#11186, sonic-net#11207, sonic-net#11213, sonic-net#11215, sonic-net#11220, sonic-net#11221, sonic-net#11257, sonic-net#11291, sonic-net#11298, sonic-net#11301, sonic-net#11326, sonic-net#11333, sonic-net#11335, sonic-net#11341, sonic-net#11344, sonic-net#11347, sonic-net#11359, sonic-net#11366, sonic-net#11368, sonic-net#11370, sonic-net#11372, sonic-net#11375, sonic-net#11385, sonic-net#11386, sonic-net#11394, sonic-net#11397, sonic-net#11401, sonic-net#11402, sonic-net#11403, sonic-net#11405, sonic-net#11414
richardyu-ms
pushed a commit
to richardyu-ms/sonic-buildimage
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2022
Related work items: sonic-net#90, sonic-net#282, sonic-net#7652, sonic-net#11220, sonic-net#11333, sonic-net#11358, sonic-net#11359, sonic-net#11371, sonic-net#11383, sonic-net#11386, sonic-net#11391, sonic-net#11398, sonic-net#11400, sonic-net#11406, sonic-net#11414, sonic-net#11421, sonic-net#11422, sonic-net#11427, sonic-net#11448, sonic-net#11451
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: Neetha John [email protected]
Why I did it
Storage backend has all vlan members tagged. If untagged packets are received on those links, they are accounted as RX_DROPS which can lead to false alarms in monitoring tools. Using this acl to hide these drops.
How I did it
Created a acl template which will be loaded during minigraph load for backend. This template will allow tagged vlan packets and dropped untagged
How to verify it
Unit tests
Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)